JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 5, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo

✓Claimant Tarsicio De Jesus Santana Buitrago·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Objeciones formuladas no se ajustan a ninguna de las causales señaladas por la Corte Constitucional para que sea procedente la declaración de nulidad de sus decisiones
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad contra la sentencia T-733/11.

Advierte la Sala Plena que las objeciones formuladas por el peticionario no se ajustan a ninguna de las causales señaladas por la Corporación para que sea procedente la declaración de nulidad de sus decisiones.

Indica además que los reclamos sólo son una reiteración de las razones consignadas en la solicitud de tutela, las cuales fueron analizadas con detenimiento y desestimadas en la sentencia frente a la cual se depreca la nulidad.

Se DENIEGA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-733 de 2011 proferida por la Sala Cuarta de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentMauricio González CuervoConcurrenceJorge Iván Palacio PalacioConcurrenceMaría Victoria Calle Correa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.